this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
725 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
996 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Artist Jingna Zhang built Cara, a platform explicitly intended to protect artists from having their art stolen by AI...and yet these people just won't leave them well enough alone.

Source thread

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If i put a garden gnome outside i'd expect people to be decent and not steal it and send it to space.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

And if they do send it to space I'd at least like to get a postcard. From space.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I though we established that making copies is not stealing...

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

maybe you should direct that to OP, they're the one mentioned stealing.

Also yes and no, depend on the circumstance. If someone download a video to watch it personally, then that wouldn't be stealing. If they then reupload to direct traffic to themselves and denying the original creator revenue, then that's stealing, but not the art, it's the revenue.

It's really about expecting people to be decent, punching up instead of punching down. If someone really wanted to be left alone in this AI infested era and doesn't want their art to be scraped and trained, then leave them be. What worst, those are independent artist that usually already struggling, not millionaires.

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We didn’t. The definition of stealing means taking something without permission. Has nothing to do with physical items.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All the people using adblockers and pirating are going to be angry.

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why? I wouldn’t call viewing a publicly accessible site stealing. It’s published to the public, therefore the permission to view it is given.

But even if you do want to classify it as stealing, so what?

Big tech is stealing our data constantly. I have no issues stealing things of my own. 🏴‍☠️

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Explain your point.

I already addressed the fact that you have permission to view public sites.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You have permission under the condition you watch the ads.

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that disclaimer is shown to the user before they enter the site then yes, that would be stealing.

Not sure I’ve ever seen that disclaimer, but I’m sure it exists.

Not really sure what your point is, this isn’t that complicated of topic.

Are you under the impression that stealing is always wrong, and there is zero room for nuance and grey area? That would explain why you can’t wrap your head around this.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago

It's in the terms and conditions, and the cookie pop-up.