this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
298 points (90.7% liked)

Technology

87390 readers
5135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ccunix@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, thanks to the anti-nuclear lobby, we are in a situation where the current reactors will have to be shutdown before the new ones are available to take their place.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 8 points 5 days ago

Yeah, the famous french anti-nuclear lobby. Those guys who control the french government with its nuclear weapons, who has also recently built a nuclear reactor. That government totally is controlled by the anti-nuclear lobby.

Or ... maybe France tried upgrading its aging nuclear reactors with the new reactor in Flamanville, which went spectacular over budget? And debt ridden EdF simply has not the funds to build over 50 new reactors at 13 billion each?

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If we could deal with the waste that we've already got, that would instill some confidence, but the govt has basically shrugged. https://youtube.com/watch?v=nLUAN2Rev1E

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Nuclear waste is an already solved problem, we just have to use the solutions. The vast majority (>99%) can be recycled.

https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-waste/radioactive-wastes-myths-and-realities

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

OK, if it's solved... Where the hell are those who take the nuclear waste of my country? Where are they??? I'm sure, we'd pay a lot of money... Where are they???

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Idk where you live but the problem is likely one (or both) of lobbied politicians kicking the can down the road (cheaper in the short term) and ignorant nimby-ists who've bought the "nuclear energy is evil" narrative pushed by the fossil fuel industry and useful idiots in green movements hook line and sinker.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

With more power than it generated?

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

No, recycling spent fuel into new fuel or even the rather wasteful process of depositing it for long-term storage uses only a fraction of the energy generated by nuclear fission in reactors.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip -4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Because it only replaces a environmental disaster with a future one. Still no (practical) way to handle the waste.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 days ago

Buddy, French reactors have been breeders for decades. They re-use the spent fuel.

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Still no (practical) way to handle the waste.

That is false. See my other comment here.

The actual problem is a lack of education amongst the populace combined with a huge surplus of lobbying and a dash of politics.

[–] ccunix@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Send it to the rain forest

Turns out humans are worse than radiation