this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
298 points (90.7% liked)

Technology

87390 readers
5135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (6 children)

lowest-carbon

Ok, now do nuclear waste.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Relatively tiny amounts that can be stored safely

Its still better than the output of coal which ironically enough output more radioactivity than nuclear powerplants

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 days ago

If only there were an option without the carbon and without the uranium.

[–] AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The entirety of France's nuclear waste since the first plant was put online fits in one Olympic swimming pool. That's 50 years worth of nuclear energy production.

We can handle it.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Canada developed reactors to run on waste fuel from other reactors.

CANDU 9 IIRC

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

CANDU 9

very interesting. for those who want to know how it works:

Most commercial reactor designs use normal water as the moderator. Water absorbs some of the neutrons, enough that it is not possible to keep the reaction going in natural uranium. CANDU replaces this "light" water with heavy water. Heavy water's extra neutron decreases its ability to absorb excess neutrons, resulting in a better neutron economy. This allows CANDU to run on unenriched natural uranium, or uranium mixed with a wide variety of other materials such as plutonium and thorium. This was a major goal of the CANDU design; by operating on natural uranium the cost of enrichment is removed. This also presents an advantage in nuclear proliferation terms, as there is no need for enrichment facilities, which might also be used for weapons.

From Wikipedia. So the key is to improve the neutron economy sothat there's more neutrons available; then, these extra neutrons can go on to split extra material, which is thereby consumed.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Nuclear waste is a solved problem.

Dig a deep hole, put the waste in the hole, and backfill the hole.

Done.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

better yet: pour it into concrete, dump it in the ocean.

it's just not done yet because people are thinking that there might be another use case for nuclear waste in the future.

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 0 points 4 days ago

Remind me again, it slipped my mind: How many of those holes are globally completed and in operation legally, explicitly rated for high-level radioactive waste and NOT explicitly labeled as an intermediate solution?

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You are talking about input materials for reactor fuel. We are told almost daily about how bad climate change is; why would new fuel inputs be anything notable as nuclear power de-carbonizes the grid?

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I didn't check, does it say that waste management is not included?