this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
8 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
4190 readers
348 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No pics of text
Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
Post news related to the United States.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Did they really miss, though? They didn't provide a complete accurate story, but that was never their goal. They were trying to push a narrative to their viewer base that reinforces stereotypes those viewers already had, and in that task, they've succeeded. The only way they'd have "missed" here is if they were forced - as part of the same story - to admit they were wrong and backpedal, so people watching that specific report saw it. Even if they later issued a correction, the damage has already been done at that point and nobody really cares.
Almost nobody who watches Fox News and believes their narrative is going to read this Salon article and even if they do, they'll likely just dismiss it as leftist propaganda or whatever. Almost nobody who is interested in this perspective would have seen the original story.
So while it's certainly interesting to read about the topic, trying to imply that Fox has egg on their collective face because of the inaccuracy of their reporting is simply misrepresenting the situation. They don't care, and neither do their viewers.
They even nearly acknowledged this in a roundabout way in the last paragraph of the article: