this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
601 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

87183 readers
4316 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

This is a weird one. If I buy a book, rare or not, do I not own it?

[–] tquid@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

Think of it like the difference between pulling your car's registration info and tracking your car across thousands of Flock cameras. At some point, scale is qualitatively different.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)
  • Buying food in order to destroy it is bad.

  • Buying art in order to destroy it, also bad.

Ownership itself is a pragmatic social construct: you “own” things insofar as that “makes sense.”

Does it make sense for Amazon to own rare books? Not really. I’m not sure why that would be allowed. It’s like a child owning a rocket. It simply makes no sense in most contexts.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting we have food and art police? Would a government body decide what I am allowed or not allowed to do with my wagyu steak? Having freedoms sometimes mean we have to accept the actions of others we disagree with.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Did I make any policy suggestions? These are simply moral facts. Laws are a matter of convenience, and if it’s inconvenient for us to legally constrain some evil behaviors, oh well.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If you buy a house, it is illegal to set it on fire. It is also illegal to pump infinite molten lead into the soil under your house. It is also illegal to spray aerosolized asbestos out of the chimney of your house 24/7.

You still own the house.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

If I buy a book, it is not illegal to destroy it. Your analogy doesn't work. You are talking about acts that could affect the health and well being of others.