this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
979 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

87412 readers
4083 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Johanno@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I see many people complaining about phones not having an audio jack anymore. But really I don't think it would make that much sense add one to the phone. The only thing I could see is to make the usb c modular like framework did.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"I don't care about this, so fuck everyone else"

Nice attitude dude.

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is not what I meant.

I don't see the reason to add it back for a few people. While most don't ever will need it

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

Why do you think "most" bought bluetooth earbuds in the first place? What's the source for your data regarding how many people want the jack back? Also, not sure where you live but in the EU it's very common to see people wearing wired earbuds/headphones.

Again, you're defending corporations taking away options from consumers while also (presumably) being a consumer yourself. Adding the jack would not make the phones more expensive and would also not take away any of the features you want. Why would anyone in their right mind be against this? What a joke.

[–] manuremy@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

One good-ish reason is that In A Certain country the Bluetooth connections are monitored by Flock cameras and all, so you will be identified if you have Bluetooth headphones on in a public place. And that's likely to spread other places too eventually..

[–] cunnililgus@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isnt broadcast done only manually? I.e. when you begin pairing? I guess it depends on device.

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes however you can still see the signal and probably identify the mac address or something.

Bluetooth is not secure.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

This is a phenomenon that is easy to demonstrate with monitor apps for airtags, pervert glasses, and even Tesla automobiles (yes, they constantly send out a Bluetooth signal your phone can pick up).

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Does Flock have any technology to read radio waves coming from wires, or is that not a thing?

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mh true. An usb c Adapter with aux and usbc inside of the case of the phone would be cool I think. Then you can easily add it to the phone where most people won't need it. And you don't have to redesign the whole phone for the audio jack

[–] manuremy@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe, that sounds good imo. But those adapters break easily, so either it should be very good adapter or easily swapped design.