this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
614 points (97.8% liked)
Greentext
8640 readers
962 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The cost of living for someone with a job can be higher than an unemployed person as they need to live where they can commute from, which can make things like living with parents or not having a car infeasible. If the job doesn't pay well enough to cover this, then having no income leaves you better off.
In the short-term, maybe? But if you have the skills to be employed, you will be much better off over time starting to work somewhere. Having a job sets you up to obtain a better or higher paying role in the future
The long-term prospects are better, but if someone doesn't have some kind of buffer like savings or the bank of mum and dad to cover the period where their earnings aren't enough to break even, then the short-term problems make the long-term benefits impossible to actually reach.
Sure, but we're talking about someone who lives with their parents and has that buffer
We're talking about someone who lives with their parents, but there's no indication they've got any buffer. If there aren't apprenticeships within walking distance of their parents' home and they pay poorly enough to not cover housing or commuting costs, then the option of living with parents doesn't do any good because they can't use that option while also doing work.