this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
34 points (97.2% liked)

politics

30837 readers
2386 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New Hampshire Democratic Rep. Jonah Orion Wheeler is again drawing attention for his views on transgender issues after calling “gender ideology” an “illiberal, backwards way of thinking” in a new video. The remarks follow Wheeler’s previous support for legislation restricting transgender rights, adding another chapter to a record that has repeatedly put him at odds with LGBTQ+ advocates and fellow Democrats.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 30 points 2 hours ago (9 children)

Is it really gender ideology to say mind your own fucking business and let people be happy?

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 12 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

Gender ideology is giving people care and community. To be a gender ideologue is to be human.

[–] hamsamrich@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I just don’t understand why they care. It’s such a non-issue. We got people starving homeless people in the richest nation of the world and they’re worried about gender?! Why not focus on making the lives of your constituents better instead of focusing on something that in no way has any effect on your life whatsoever? It will never make sense to me.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

It's easy. It's all because it's disgusting to them. In their worldview bad things happen to bad people, so if you're poor or homeless, you're a bad person. And that's revolting, so poor people suffering is good actually.

Women are also disgusting. They need to remain at their station. That's why they hate LGBTQ+ people, we don't conform to their ideas.

Lesbians and trans-men are disgusting because they were lesser and claim to be more. Trans-women and gay dudes are the reverse of that; we're debasing ourselves by being lesser.

It's all about social hierarchy and domination, people needing to remain in their spot, happy with their lot.

Religion and the mindset it fosters is evil, because it causes even regular, caring people to do and excuse the most heinous things, thinking that it's good.

Mother Teresa is a great example, a literal saint, yet a horrible woman who deliberately made people suffer because she believed that suffering to be holy. To be Good.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 20 minutes ago

Right. Conservatism is about hierarchy. Hierarchy is good and natural. You get shit on by your betters, and you get to shit on your lessers. Trying to change that is horrifying. It's going to mess up the world! And if hierarchy isn't good and natural, then all the suffering I experienced was unjust, and all the cruelty I inflicted was mere cruelty. Can't have that. I'm a good person who deserves my lot in life. Even if it's not royalty. There have to be royals.

It's a shit world view built on cruelty and cowardice.

[–] hamsamrich@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I guess that does explain it a bit.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

To keep their stupid tricked base in a constant low level state of outrage is the only answer that makes sense.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)