this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
204 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

87507 readers
2934 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I'm not unsympathetic to accessibility issues, but at the same time it's REALLY suspicious how much internet randos (especially on Bluesky) suddenly started being really militant about alt-tagging at EXACTLY the same time as the tech billionaires started needing tagged images to train their clankers.

[–] Goblin@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

There was a deadline in March for all federally funded institutions to follow accessibility guidelines. Not sure if that's had an effect on stuff outside of their scope, but it does align with the timing.

The deadline was extended to next March at the very last moment.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Uhhh. You've never had a beer with a QA tester I'm guessing. I was getting grief back when apple still made and sold iPods for this. Categorically; not a new phenomenon.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for that textbook example of the exception proving the rule: a QA tester is as far from "internet rando" as you can get; the fact that you had to cite someone whose actual job is to make sure accessibility law is followed, proves how few actually good examples there are.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Riiiiiiight. Right! Those QA testers were kept in pods, had no friends or interactions outside of their jobs, and ZERO motivation to espouse accessibility standards to me outside of those professional boundaries.

None of them were color blind or hearing impaired. All perfect humans just like everyone else. No stories or personal anecdotes to make an impact. So few good examples. Sigh.

We never, ever, ever went out as a group with the designers or anyone from any other walk of life, never talked about our siloed skillsets, never met each other's friends or spouses.

Not once did we have a discussion about the selection bias you referenced.

Fucking /s if it's not obvious, and I suggest getting to know your peers better versus your rather peculiar brand of solipsism

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

dude it reads like you're just arguing for the sake of arguing and completely lost sight of (or deliberately misunderstood) what my original point was. And then you're capping it off with an unnecessary personal attack. Maybe you're the one that needs to reassess your values?

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Ok sure "frequency-of-accessibility-comments-suggests-conspiracy" guy.

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

People on Mastodon have been like that forever, though. I just thought it was a tendency that came from that culture.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

That's never sat right with me either.