this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
386 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

10424 readers
727 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. See stickied post https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Wasn't the problem that you got more information in the same time so that the footage had to be sped up and that looked silly ?

[โ€“] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 4 points 4 weeks ago

It's more because there was no blur covering everything so you definitely saw some of the tricks they used. Saw it was just costumes and stuff.

It wasn't major or like in your face in my opinion but it was there, and people couldn't accept a transition time as studios figured out how to make stuff look good at the higher frame rate. Better or different makeup or add more oomph to costumes or whatever.

If you go and look at old forum comments about movies like, I want to say The Prestige (2006), some of the first ones to hit Blu-ray, they said similar stuff. The higher pixel counts revealed when rocks were fake and sets and stuff.