this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
1668 points (99.2% liked)
Fuck AI
8153 readers
1970 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not quite equivalent. While I 100% agree it's pretty fucked to do this with AI, and obviously it has to get the source material somewhere. The law is the law and you being upset, triggered, or have some traumatic relapse means absolutely dick. If someone draws kiddie porn, it's perfectly legal (although fucking disgusting) but still legal, even if they used a kid they saw while shooing for groceries. AI is being treated the same way, it's generating (drawing) based on what it's learned, the same way a pedo creeper would.
So to approach AI generated pedo porn being illegal you'd need to approach drawing it is illegal, in which case it would be nearly impossible. Since (someone) drew it they could always argue that they just look young and there's no real way to prove it unless they outright admit it, which isn't happening.
Like I said, the shit is fucked up, but LEGALLY it's legal and a grey area at best no matter how anyone feels about it.
Edit. If down voting me makes you feel better, go for it. I'm just explaining to you why it went the way that it did regardless of how you feel about. I'm sorry if you're upset by how things are handled. Like I said, if you feel better and can't handle the truth of how it was handled and why it was decided that then I'm sorry down vote me so you feel like you're doing something productive and I'm a bad person for explaining it.
To your first point, it's actually not legal, and possessing even drawn cp has been treated as a similar crime (which imo is incredibly stupid).
In the case of AI, the training data often included real CSAM material, so it's more like I viewed csam (illegal) then drew it from memory (still illegal but less so).
Humans are given the benefit of "I gathered this data and created a new thing out of it" because that's beneficial to humans. I'm not going to say that humans creating something is magically different from how an AI does, but it's training on often stolen data and/or throttling tons of websites to scrape their data against the wishes of the hosters. It's like if I steal a movie and then make my own movie slightly based on it, the problem isn't my movie, it's the process to get to it (and that it's a human who is benefitting from the result).
lol jesus christ....well enjoy your legal child porn while it lasts then...