this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
395 points (99.3% liked)
Fuck AI
8128 readers
1221 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’m a big fan of Veritasium. I don’t think I’ve seen an AI video by them yet though. Are the AI ones still with Derek and Casper and the people?
Perhaps I just haven’t gotten to the AI ones yet. Last one I watched was about the billion heart beats in mammals and metabolic rates.
They're private equity. Have been for a while now.
I jumped ship when I found out.
Can you explain how that has impacted the quality? Personally I still enjoy the channel and learn a lot from it. Does private equity bring the risk that their content will be too tightly controlled?
No, i can't because i quit watching. I don't support private equity.
Different guy, but to me while quality hasn't really fallen they are starting to feel "less organic". The stories feel more biased and sensationalised, in general I see more focus on entertainment than education. The "value" is still mostly there for me, but its purpose has changed from teaching to making line go up and it shows a little bit
Ah, I see. Thanks for explaining. I think I agree with you.
Personally, I found that they used to be a "follow the passion" channel. They were interested in a topic and shared what they found out. You could tell they cared.
Slowly, even before the private equity thing, you could tell that they were making videos for business reasons. Either cause they thought it was going to be a popular topic, or because it was going to make them money from a partnership.
Both types of content results in educational videos. The problem is that when you start with a conclusion and work backwards to the content, instead of working from curiosity, it really shows.
There continues to be content out there that starts with passion and works towards an organic conclusion. I'll continue spending my time watching those instead of channels run by the financial end of the business.
That’s a good explanation. Mind sharing some of your other channels/creators that you enjoy more? I’d be keen to see.
Steve Mould is a great example of someone who sees a topic and digs deep because he's curious, but doesn't have a specific theme.
Cody's Lab is another of the original generalized YouTube channels, but it's a lot rougher. He doesn't spend ton of time making clean videos.
Most of the other channels I watch are dedicated to a specific topic, like Practical Engineering, Technology Connections, or Nile Red.
This problem is especially prevalent in the Making community. You can see someone who just enjoys sharing building techniques slowly expand their workshop to one that none of their viewers can afford, and they become a "watch me make something that you can buy from me" channel.
A few that have avoided this are Woodworking for Mere Mortals, and Blondihacks.
There's also people that make crazy projects that would likely kill you if you tried to repeat them, like Hyperspace Pirate.
Just don't be afraid to ditch a channel after they lose their way, sometimes it's best to move on to a different channel that still has a passion.
Unfortunately, it feels like the best ones are the channels that use it as a side hobby, not as a full time gig.
You're right. I think maybe I'm just having bad days where I get hypercritical of things and then I see a video that's just less focused and I make assumptions.
I had assumed earlier on that they were using ai assets for visual aids but had no evidence for that. I didn't examine any further because that just wouldn't bother me. But the most recent video on filming solar eclipse has cuts and interactions that were probably just clumsily edited but for some reason I hyper fixated on. The previous one I felt off about was the one about EMV chips. Things like cutting to team members having conversations that recap the thing that was just shown or explained. It's not proof at all but I thought, hey that's how generative ai writes.
Op's video addresses this issue where we're getting so hypervigilant about ai that I thought I saw it in places where I had no evidence to think it was happening. so I guess that phenomenon is real
I guess we won’t know fully. I saw in a recent video right at the beginning it said “all the animations in this video were made by humans”. But that’s just one video. I still like the channel but yes if it gets Sloppy I would be very sad.