this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
913 points (98.5% liked)

People Twitter

10395 readers
1221 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. You can replace the addres of .x.com to xcancel.com in the address. https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There quote comes from here: https://youtu.be/bz5Hjk40FD4?t=2709

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, that's not how it works. People believe it because they can pay people to repeat their lies, and their success buys them a seat in main-stream media interviews where they can broadcast their bullshit to millions of people. And in Musk's case, he can just buy a social media company and force it to boost his excreta.

[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Dude, Epstein himself was about to release an "interview" where he's this approachable cool guy and he's just eccentric. I bet you it would have worked if released as planned.

Yes there are bot accounts pushing narratives but that doesn't stop people from going "whoa everyone must be wrong about him"

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My point is that people don't believe it just because he's rich. People believe it because it's made to sound believable, and repeated from every angle by many outlets. It's not really about bots but rather a complicit media.

[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I don't disagree with your statements