this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
317 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

87878 readers
2785 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An investigation by Gamers Nexus found LG smart TVs sweep local networks to map phones and nearby devices. Tests also showed the sets can capture microphone audio with the screen off — they then upload data once reconnected to the internet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Seppo@sopuli.xyz 56 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

It is illegal. Unfortunately crime is legal for corporations. They just pay the crime fee and can continue undisturbed. Shareholders must be held responsible individually, otherwise it will only get worse.

[–] Jajcus@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 hours ago

Not shareholders. Decision makers. Upper msnagement. Shareholders shpuld pay in share value (the finantial penalty to the corporations should be high enough to affect that), bu the personal an criminal responsibility belongs to managers, CEO in particular.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (4 children)

Shareholders must be held responsible individually

So, are you personally on the hook here because the company managing your pension fund is holding stocks in LG? Because that technically makes you a shareholder as it was bought with your money, right?

Edit: not sure why I get downvoted, this is a legitimate concern/nuance to the debate. The managing company doesn't own these stocks so they're not the shareholders, that's the people whose money they are managing, but these people are not directly in control of the funds. Who is the liable party in this?

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 37 minutes ago

That might stop this madness.

See the thing is if your pension also funds a murder company does outsourcing who manages it not make you at least a little culpable? I think it does and i think the only way to stop this madness is for a little justice to come your way.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 hour ago

The highest level employee/officer who had knowledge of it should be held responsible

[–] Seppo@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 hour ago

It doesn't matter how many layers of evasion there are. Responsibility has to be with individuals in order for there to be change.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

The fact that a pension fund can hold shareholds is crazy by itself, also, is the pension found a company or managed by your state? It shouldn't really be a thing in first place

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

is the pension fund a company or managed by your state?

Both in my case, as there are both the government pension fund that is mandatory and the one used by my employer which uses one of the large primary pension institutions in my country.

Is it a bit weird that I don't just manage all my pensions myself? Yes, a bit. But it's how its done in my country and it has some tax benefits compared to getting the money in hand and investing myself.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 1 hour ago

Is it a bit weird that I don't just manage all my pensions myself?

Naah, at least, i don't know anyone that does it in my country