this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
863 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87925 readers
4254 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Am I the only one who thinks big tech won't do jack shit other than nod and smile and install a user button that doesn't actually change anything at all?

They are so NOT going to turn this off. This -- the ability to manipulate users by controlling exactly what they see -- is the sole reason they are in business. It gets them ad revenue, data to resell, and massive, uncontrollable political power.

And they're just going to let a user turn that highly individualized control off and turn themselves into a less monetizable, more ad immune user one by one because some govt told them to? The same governments that have been telling them not to do this or that for decades now?

Lol, pull the other one.

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tbf they already do that. Google's had a button to turn off ad personalization that's never worked since like, 2014 or something

[–] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It DOES work, they don't show ads based on personalized data. What it's not garanteed is that are not processing or selling your data on the back anyway.

[–] capital5@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ad personalization is hard to verify because it's all happening on the backend. What you see in a feed is much more visible, so maybe that will make it harder to work around. I haven't read much about how the legislation works and how it defines algorithms, but if it's something like, "only show me people I've subscribed to", then it would be pretty easy to verify whether they are showing that or not.

But in general, I agree. Big tech companies always find a way to work around this legislation. Enforcement is the issue, not the laws themselves.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

I find it easy (when I'm not blocking literally every ad) because they are usually so fucking dumb - do you constantly get bombed by ads about stuff you've recently researched and purchased? If yes, personalization is on.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Huh, TIL. Thanks. Not even remotely surprised.