this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
598 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

87956 readers
3366 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

oh yeah, it literally could just be robot dogs with "kill anyone who's an insurgent, and detain anyone who assists insurgents" orders and AI to let them go buck wild with that prompt.

You could end up with children getting shot because an AI starts hallucinating if they don't put adequate guard rails.

And that's like a worst case situation. Realistically, you end up with just a lot more brutality in war because people are detached from the violence they cause as an invading force, and way less PTSD. Wars in the Middle East start sounding more and more like statistics that no one really wants to hear about, and there's way less soldiers to choose to disregard unlawful orders.

You could see a fuck load more war crime with such human detachment, I think. We probably already deal with this to a large extent with drones.

Not that I'd prefer humans dying, but we should avoid robotic invasion wars like the plague imo.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't new. The pilots who flew bombers in WW2 probably killed many more people than the average soldier, but their levels of PTSD were far lower than the guys who had to kill face to face, one at a time.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Who would of thought pressing a button to kill people is less traumatic than killing them face to face in a life or death struggle.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Wars in the Middle East start sounding more and more like statistics that no one really wants to hear about

Has this not been the case for the past 25 years already? No real need for "AI" when you already have an obedient and trigger-happy military with plenty of remote-controlled toys and your populace is brainwashed to believe "brown person = terrorist".

way less soldiers to choose to disregard unlawful orders

What is the last known case of a US soldier disregarding an unlawful order? If anything, the military is full of assholes who are happy to kill for fun. See: Graham Platner

Will AI make it easier and/or cheaper? Probably, sadly. But it won't be a qualitative change.

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 1 points 23 hours ago

What is the last known case of a US soldier disregarding an unlawful order?

Plenty of such reports from falcon pilots. They're close enough to see the destruction they're causing, so several stories have emerged of pilots calling off attacks

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

People are people. Even soldiers of any nation.