Fuck AI

8190 readers

3026 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

129

OpenAI might have stolen another major math proof (xcancel.com)

submitted 16 hours ago by solrize@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not Navier-Stokes, that was a couple days ago, old news. It's one of the less famous problems they posted around the same time.

The cited Mathstodon post is here: https://mathstodon.xyz/@andreasthom/117240535270608201

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Well, one obvious example is licensing. You can have things that are presented online with a terms of service or an actual license that excludes certain uses.

One specific example would be GitHub and the sites like it. There are plenty of public facing code bases with licensing that would prohibit forms of reuse, like for financial gain.

And yes, this appears to be what the researchers believed to be private conversations, but are likely completely owned by the AI companies in their terms of service.