this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
130 points (93.9% liked)

Selfhosted

62050 readers
1238 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Self-Host Weekly is sponsored by Coder. AI coding agents run on your laptop with your credentials, your network access, and no record of what they touched. Coder is open source and gives every agent a self-hosted workspace you define in Terraform, so your code never leaves the machines you own.

Nasty. I thought this was satire at first and had to read it back.

[–] darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From the newsletter:

no record of what they touched

From the site:

Centralized model access and policy-controlled environments with full observability and auditability across all AI usage.

We might have some wires crossed somewhere.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The first quote is a dig at their competitors. The second code is a description of the solution their project provides.

[–] darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm guessing the blurb was provided by coder and not written by the author. Like someone else said, it could've been worded better.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seriously. I had to read that five times to see if I was missing sarcasm. What a fucking awful product.

[–] chris@links.openriver.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you help me understand why this is awful?

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're serious.... Essentially their AI impersonates you with impunity and keeps no records of what it's done. Its a fucking security nightmare at best.

[–] chris@links.openriver.net 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was reading this as the solution or safeguard against that problem.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm a dumbass and totally misread it. You're right, it's the solution, not the problem. I downvoted myself for being a moron.

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 22 hours ago

You're not a dumbass, it's just poorly-written.

[–] illusionist@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago