this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
129 points (77.4% liked)

Memes

56978 readers
1014 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources

You can notice a bias towards the state media from pro-capitalist regimes from the above.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1Malayali@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Idk, why should this issue be seen as good?

And what is your culture? Is Wikipedia good for it?

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's not? Being informed is always positive, and it's always unfortunate that bias exists. I'd rather learn and try to understand my own bias, as opposed to being ignorant and having bias anyway

Do you have a tool that is just as accessible as wiki, but perfectly objective? Or are you throwing the baby out with the bath-water? Knowledge is good for any culture, and bias is a motherfucker to us all. Your critique isn't unwarranted, but it does flirt with anti-intellectualism

[–] 1Malayali@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Being informed of the bias is also positive

No one mentioned anything about throwing the bathwater, but only hinted at the bias.

Are you trying to villainise and portray it as anti-intellectualism?
Are you thinking that the source you use is unbiased and trying to derial convos that hint at how it is not unbiased?

Noting the bias is a good thing and trying to shut down the convoys on that is a bigger mf to all of us.

Your concerns isn't unwarranted, but it does flirt with strawmanning and derailing the convo.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com -1 points 7 hours ago

Sounds like we both flirt with some bias, doesn't it?