this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
91 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43591 readers
239 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Flock Safety announced a voluntary employee separation program on Friday, offering a “generous” severance package to those who want to leave amid growing backlash against the surveillance technology company, according to an internal email shared with WIRED.

Applications for Flock’s voluntary severance program opened Friday, and employees have until October 2 to decide whether to leave the company. Flock expects to grant buyouts to the majority of workers who apply, according to the email. People familiar with the program but not authorized to discuss it publicly say they believe that a significant number of the startup’s roughly 1,500 employees may try to depart.

Flock is making the severance offers as it continues to lose customers amid growing frustration across the US about its sprawling network of license plate readers, which have raised concerns about privacy and misuse. In the last month, WIRED has documented officers allegedly abusing Flock to track former romantic partners and colleagues, exposed how widely some agencies share access to the system, shown how little is known about the manufacturing of the devices, and revealed in new detail how much information Flock’s cameras collect based on data from a dismantled Flock device.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article seems to conveniently hide the rampant corruption between Flock and local governments. Not that Wired has an obligation to include it, of course, but it's still relevant context as to why everyone hates Flock.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, at a certain point, you have to go with the angle of the current story. I know this is going to be a hell of a stretch, but that's sort of like expecting any car review of a new Ford to include the founder's anti-Semitism.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't love this analogy. You're comparing something out of living memory with something that's still actively going on right this second.

I think it's always worthwhile to at least mention it, or else you give the impression we've collectively moved on.

[–] verily@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago

Right. The article is about loss of contracts, it seems more than reasonable to include a perfunctory explanation about how those contracts came about to begin with.