this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
325 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

88163 readers
2846 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And why is it so relatively cheap? Where did they cut corners? Are they spying on you like the cheap Chinese TVs? It can’t be just because it’s government subsidized.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The Chinese government is subsidizing them to gain market share just like American tech companies do with VC funding.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

One way the Chinese government is "subsidizing" their cars is by suppressing the living standards of its people.

That and their industry doesn't appear to be as bloated and shareholder-driven.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

suppressing the living standards of its people.

You mean letting billionaires avoid tax, adding tariffs to everything, and driving up the price of gas?

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Chinese people don't invest in stocks because you'd have to be a fool to compete with the Chinese government as an investor. Returns are perpetually suppressed.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

JFC Lemmy... BYD is a public company and was originally funded by Warren Buffet. He made almost 9 billion.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Key figures and findings regarding BYD's government funding include:

 The Kiel Institute Study (2018–2022): A widely cited study by Germany’s Kiel Institute for the World Economy estimated that BYD received approximately $3.7 billion (€3.4 billion) in direct government subsidies between 2018 and 2022.  

 Scaling Support: State aid to the company ramped up significantly over time. For example, out of the $3.7 billion tracked through 2022, a major share—roughly $2.2 billion—was awarded in 2022 alone.  

 Annual Financial Disclosures: BYD regularly lists government grants, subsidies, and R&D support in its public financial reports. For instance, annual filings have shown billions of yuan in recurring state backing channeled into specific production lines and technological innovations.

Broader Context

While the $3.7 billion figure covers tracked direct corporate aid, international trade analysts and economists point out that BYD's total structural advantages also stem from wider government policies. These include:  

 Supply Chain Subsidies: Extensive state backing upstream in the EV supply chain, particularly for battery manufacturers (such as localized support for lithium processing and battery cell production).

 Infrastructure and Operational Perks: Access to heavily subsidized land, cheap electricity, and localized tax incentives designed to accelerate China's green technology and clean energy sectors.

[–] mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Basically, the only thing the US failed to do from this list was a successful pivot to green technologies and the cheap, abundant electricity they could provide. There were many plans that had plans to process and build lithium batteries, that were dismantled after Trump 2.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Honestly I do think the US should do this too. But as China is currently the only one doing it on this scale, it is vastly skewing market dynamics.

[–] 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 19 hours ago

I would prefer no spying. But with the US being a fascist surveillance state run by greedy billionaires, American cars are no better. Either pick one from a functioning liberal country or focus on the tech. China is clearly ahead on tech.

[–] AlloyAhoy@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago

The motive isn't to extract as much capital out of the customers as possible.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They are spying yes,all the others are too which doesnt make it ok but that is why it is subsidised by the state.

They cut corners on comfort and noise levels from my experience of similar brands

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Rather would get spied on by domestic corps than foreign ones.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Oh so you'd like to rather lick the foreign boot?
Very nice.
American, Russian, Chinese or Israeli?

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Why? The domestic corps actually have access to you to use that information. What's china gonna do with my data that is gonna affect me 12k miles away?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Coorporate with other entitities and then sell a full picture on me to the local authorities?
Idk mate. Honestly.
How about no spying? Can we do that?