this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
1244 points (98.5% liked)

Funny

16292 readers
834 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] naught101@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Source: AI" is kinda wild for this purpose

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don’t understand your comment - bogleheads is a forum of real people? I included a silly example illustrative of my point, but the forum is decidedly not AI. Did you miss the first link, which was the point of my comment?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Literally the first sentence of the post you linked to says:

I asked AI for advice on how to reduce our risk of the various AI stocks in our portfolio

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Couldn’t make it past the first comment, or are forums a new thing for you?

Yes that’s how the thread started - what else did you learn?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I read through 20 or 30 comments, there is nothing that provides any evidence of your original claim, it's all just speculation and further GenAI crystal ball gazing (and a few other comments calling out that crystal ball gazing).

I guess the concept of "evidence" is a new thing for you?

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well if you can’t find it, it must not be there

[–] trebach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The first post in that thread had a guy using AI to figure out how much of his portfolio was in AI.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] trebach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

I messed up and should have replied to the guy above you.