this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
52 points (94.8% liked)

Selfhosted

62398 readers
500 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
52
Wikidocs (for storing your home-lab structure) (github.com)
submitted 5 days ago by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Probably old hat to some...but documentation is important. Just for once...I am trying to keep documentation AHEAD of the inevitable bork that destroys everything... so that in 3 months time I don't have to reconstitute everything out of thin air and swearing.

Anyhow, I came across this lovely little repo a while ago and though "yes, next time, use this"

https://github.com/Zavy86/WikiDocs

And so I am :)

I'll let the author speak to the perks (no affiliation, I just like wikidocs and wanted to share it)

  • Open source
  • Plain text files
  • No database required
  • Markdown syntax
  • YAML Frontmatter
  • Editor full WYSIWYG
  • Support for KaTeX math
  • Support for Mermaid diagrams
  • Unlimited page revisions
  • Uploading and downloading attachments
  • Uploading images (also from clipboard)
  • Content can be categorized in namespaces
  • Public and private browsing
  • Desktop and remote sync
  • Syntax highlighting
  • Multiple languages
  • Dark mode

While I show off a happy snap

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr -2 points 3 days ago

I see you want to sink me under a lot of points, allow me to do the same:

  1. You'd have to be really naive to think that a project contains four AGENTS.md files and pretend AI wasn't used
  2. .editorconfig is, at it says, a config for editors. You can pretty much infer that an editor was used, but you can't say which. Just like an AGENTS.md indicates an AI was used, or is expected to be used, but you can't know which one
  3. I said this project is AI-oriented, which the phrase you cite conforts.
  4. No one here is saying that Claude coded it. I raised the point because I assume AI was used, and this is what the policy talks about
  5. "Your promotional post" talks about the post, not the project
  6. "If you are promoting a project" talks about you promoting the project, meaning the post, not the project
  7. This is /c/selfhosted on lemmy.world. Other communities have other rules. The post you point to is made in another community, it's irrelevant here.
  8. This is /c/selfhosted on lemmy.world. I'm asking the question in the community. Note that my instance isn't lemmy.world.
  9. The discussion isn't stickied nor linked from the rules. But it does exist

Shall we next audit every IDE autocomplete suggestion the dev ever accepted, look at their CV, review their commit history and inspect what they ate for lunch?

Is it possible to discuss as adults or do you have to resort to absurd arguments ?

I assume that the tags don't exist but to convey information. The information is relevant whether the author of the post is the author of the project or not, that's why I asked for it.

If you want my opinion on something that, as you said, as already be decided: if it's too complicated to know whether AI was used, then flag it as AIP. There will be issues, just like any decision, but it will be a different set of issues. But are you really interested in my opinion or do you just want to pretend differing opinions are absurd ?

Or can we just share cool things we find and let end users make up their own minds?

That wouldn't be in the spirit of disclosure, the one that was accepted by the community and for which you pinged a moderator now would it