434
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2026
434 points (98.9% liked)
Technology
88271 readers
3147 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not just the US congress.
I always like to cite a relative, who's turning 90 soon, who had to learn computers & internet in the 90s to stay afloat in his business. And he did, and did it well. Why does the same not apply to politicians all over the world? It's beyond me.
Of course younger people will have it easier there, but this is not purely a question of age. I suspect it's a question of wealth and hubris, like: I can't be arsed to learn technology, one of my employees will take care of it. Oh and print out these emails, will you, doll.
It takes effort and humility, how many older folks do you know that have those? Except your example?
Age divisions are a wedge issue like any other wedge issue, designed to distract from the wealth inequality fiercely fought for by the oligarchs.
Like several other wedge issues, there are a few valid points there. But it's mostly to distract. And there's plenty of counter-points - like statistics that show young people are turning nazi at rates that mean the problem of "Boomers" is not going to die out.