this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
509 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

88329 readers
3455 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _chris@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Oh and don’t worry, if ICE vehicles go away, the politicians will find some way to levy an 8/9ths tax on something else to make up for not having those fuel sales.

Toll roads for everyone?

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Toll roads for everyone?

id hope so, currently much of it comes from general revenue and second order costs arent factored in, so for example heath care costs subsidise road use.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Toll roads for everyone?

id hope

Monkey Paw

Granted but its because you now live in ancapistan

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 6 points 1 day ago

If you think fuel tax is the majority cost of owning a car, you are going to be disappointed. And why shouldn't car owners pay to maintain the roads? And how do you think that happens? If it isn't taxes it will likely be tolls.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

We need to figure out how to pay for road upkeep somehow.

That’s not to say the way gas taxes are allocated to road maintenance now is perfect. Far from it. But on paper (at least where I’m from) that’s how roads are maintained.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

A vehicle tax applied to everything, based on weight, once we have switched to a majority of EVs.

Heck I would happily pay for my bikes, apply it evenly between everything, and I will pay £1 per kilo a year. Less than £40 for my bikes, but not sure many car drivers are going to be happy paying £1500 - £3000+.

Sill, a good way to get the infrastructure fixed, and maybe more people onto public transport or bikes

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, fuel taxes are supposed to pay for that. Given the state of the roads at least here in California, it sure doesn’t look like it happens.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I’m also in California and would agree. The word “supposed” is doing a lot of work there.

On the other hand, with so many EVs in California we have to at least consider a part of that is because of the loss of gas tax income.

[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Depending on the jurisdiction.... Gas taxes go towards externalities largely. Roads are funded through general revenue. Perversely, those who don't drive subsidize drivers.

If I could wave a wand that I dont have:

Gas tax to cover externalities

Tire tax to cover externalities

Toll fees to cover usage.

Reduce income tax and increase social assistance proportionally.

Obviously that would be impossible to sell, but it would be more fair, and incentive better outcomes.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sales tax makes sense to cover roads because a lot of the wear and tear on the roads is caused by the trucks that deliver goods. Even if you bike to the store, you are using the roads in that way.

[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Cars sitting in the garage have less impact than cars on the road though.

With tolls you can be more targeted. A road in a city has more cost (land and maintenance) and greater externalities (negatively impacts more people)

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where im at registration is a factor of 2/4x to make up for the fuel tax. Fun times.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean yeah?

Roads are not free. Fuel was a reasonable proxy for usage previously. Without that it just leaves non drivers to subsidise driving.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Im not disagreeing, it just kinda sucks that im in a VERY low paying with VERY high taxes for our area. In theory that means we should be getting better services. But its quite the opposite.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

True. However as has prices rise the 'savings' should increase further such that the tax feels smaller compared to the fuel 'savings'.

The other thing to consider is that high weight vehicles, think tractor trailers, but also EVs to an extent, do significantly more damage to the roads they operate on. I wonder if the proliferation of EVs will increase road wear.