this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2026
67 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12498 readers
618 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper cautioned against the prospect of Alberta separation in a column Friday, writing that even voting just to "send a message" would represent a fraught approach.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

But that's not what's under discussion here. If Alberta wants what Quebec has they can already do it. No referendum or new laws required.

They can't have the ridiculous amount they "calculated" from the CPP as theirs, nor make a go of a pension fund with only 4.2 million peoples. Which is why the idea died.

Harper made all those arguments, yes.

However I stand by my point here; Harper is validating the separatism by discussing it seriously, and failing to call out the deceptive "research" put forward in argument for. Anyone arguing AB should stay without debunking these is in league as far as I'm concerned.

Harper's using the moment to enhance his public image while giving the separatists a free pass.

[–] quanin@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

So your opinion is that the "research" put forward in favour of separation should be taken seriously? Because that's what engaging with it is doing.

[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

🤦

No it should not be taken seriously, it should be debunked for the fraudulent word salad it is.

[–] quanin@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

It should not be given airtime at all. If you give it airtime, then you are taking it seriously.

[–] HonoredMule@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

I can agree with that. Movements that have been long incubated in silos can't be suffocated, and these days they're just "big tenting" their way to legitimacy. Dismissal without correction withholds legitimacy about as well as shame affects the shameless.