this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2026
659 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

88620 readers
3787 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eicker@lemmy.world 119 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

AI companies spent years treating copyright like a Terms of Service box nobody reads. Now a court has suggested that »we copied it to build a competing product« may not magically become fair use because you sprinkle AI on top. Turns out disruption is slightly less fun when the disrupted people have lawyers.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 76 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, Congress will end up doing whatever its paid to do.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

As far as I can tell, the 3rd circuit is just one step below the Supreme Court. So unless they take the case it’s pretty stuck. Congress would have to go above and beyond to change the existing laws to allow it.

Also with midterms coming up congress is going to have a harder time passing a law. Especially if the republicans lose the house or the senate. Then they’d have to get the democrats and the republicans to play ball, vs just one currently.

[–] ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

IMO Disney and other copyright holders have more lobbying power than AI companies at this time.

That said, damages of a winning suit will end up being minuscule compared the revenue these companies have made from said piracy.

[–] Nobody@anarchist.nexus 11 points 9 hours ago

It’s hilarious that the final boss for AI could end up being The Mouse and Associates.

It feels disgusting to root for the copyright legions. Sign of the times.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Remember, Congress makes the laws that courts rule on.

Congress does change legislation for its buddies to get around the court system.

Gun manufacturers have their own little Congressional immunity from lawsuits, for instance, (PLCAA).

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 2 points 58 minutes ago

It's too late to change the legislation now. The piracy was commited under current law.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Yeah…no. This is going to the Supreme Court and there’s zero chance their right wing, Trump-choad-gargling asses don’t rule in favor of AI companies.