this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2026
971 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

88659 readers
4434 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The idea of the self-checkout was that you literally just pass by some scanner with a full cart and it instantly displays the list of items with prices and sum. You just need to tap your card or phone on the reader and are done with it.

The implemented reality was very far away from that idea though. That's why it failed.
Customers are pissed because they have to do the cashier's job. And they do compensate themselves with some extra price reduction as a system requiring cooperation obviously can't reliably detect theft. And if you had a detective watching the cams, you could as well just go back to cashiers - which they seem to now do.

In the end this is yet another failed "fake it till you make it" bet on future tech which just didn't materialize in time. Shops can tank some customer dissatisfaction for a time and then profit a lot from being the first to do the new thing when it becomes actually possible a few months later. But pissing off the shoppers isn't a good long-term strategy.