this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
786 points (97.6% liked)

Greentext

8864 readers
378 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The population isn't declining, though. See for yourself: https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

Edit: Granted, it is in some countries: China, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea to name a few.

[–] inconel@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The slowing down of population growth is real though. Trend of fewer children is across the board not just developed countries. Current trajectory estimates population to peak out in 2050-2080 and then decline, for some in their youth in next 30 or 50 years may not be that too far to completely dismiss.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

2050-2080

Depending on how climate change goes, population might decline by many billions. Hopefully I’ll be dead by then.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Scroll down that page a bit and you'll find the "Rate of Growth" chart where you can see a clear decline in birth rate increase globally since the 1960s and it'll only be another decade or so with current trends before we are in genuine negative population growth. And that's also assuming there are no more pandemics and/or global scale ecologocial catastrophes likely to happen in that time (there almost certainly will be).

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 4 points 1 week ago

That’s not what the given website says. The given source predicts a continuous growth until at least 2100, while the growth rate slowly grinds to a halt but doesn’t go negative. Obviously this is only one possible forecast, others give different outcomes

I think it's because we are living longer and the effects of lower birthrate will be shown later