this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
786 points (97.6% liked)

Greentext

8864 readers
378 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotAnOtter@lemmus.org 12 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Lower population is generally better for almost all sectors.

But lowering the population means killing people or restricting birthing rights.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Well no. That’s a wildly incorrect take.

Birth rates are already decreasing and are below replacement rate in many places already. Fertility rates are at an all time low. They naturally decrease as income and quality of life increases.

The global fertility rate is 2.2 births per woman. Which is just barely above replacement. In most developed nations, that rate is down in the 1.6 range, well below replacement.

Total Human population is excepted to peak within 50 years and then begun naturally declining, but many countries are already there. China has seen several consecutive years of population decline. India is seeing a leveling off of population growth and will soon decline. The US is increasing solely off of immigration. Japan has a decreasing population. Same with Korea. 8 EU countries have seen population declines over the last 20 years.

If you wanted to see population decline in the US specifically, banning immigration would do it and we’d see a decline in the next census.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 13 points 1 week ago

People can also just stop breeding. Seems to be happening in a lot of developed countries. Might be slower but I bet the population will level off eventually. Or plummet dramatically from climate change/right wing political policies.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Well, I dunno about you, but I'm in no hurry to get children.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 11 points 1 week ago

Or people just saying "nah"

[–] Damage@feddit.it 10 points 1 week ago

Population is already lowering in developed nations

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah... It's something that has to happen naturally or really slowly to not be eugenicist AF.

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Thanos has entered the chat.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

The same people having the same offspring, but later, would lower the population.

So long as people die like regular you can stuff all those dreadful fantasies. Unfortunately, malice is not required for this number to go down.

war kills people and is sometimes popular