this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
884 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

33595 readers
2633 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We've yet to be able to replicate it from the old parts of meat we know are involved in it with the addition of electricity in the ways it should need in even the much simpler flesh of insects, amphibians, and reptiles. Best we can do is make a muscle twitch without causing observable thought/emergent nureaul processes.

So even if we can, we're so far from it that thinking we're on the cusp seems delusional to me.

Edit: as response shows, we have in fact also gotten it brain cell "twitches" by direct stimulation of braincells. Sadly it didn't seem to be rigged up to measure overall brain activity.

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 1 day ago

Two points:

  • using stem cells so it remained biological brain cells, rather than a mechanical reproduction.
  • they directly stimulate it with electricity and it then has a response to that stimuli, they don't seem to be hooking it up to check for additional processes; it's a step up, I guess, from direct stimulation for motor function in a frog - but not anything more revolutionary.

So, guess I'll need to update my post slightly, but the core point remains.

That said, I felt that they were saying for half of it that they were running Doom on a braincell using computer, rather than getting a braincell computer to respond to it for half the article. Oh well.