this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
87 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
88823 readers
3529 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If I were a dictator I would permit only 4-5 models of smartphones. Why produce huge amounts of shit if you can just make a few decent machines? That would save an enormous amount of resources and energy.
You did say if you were a dictator, not some kind of genius. So fair enough
Compared to all the configurations of smart phones in the early days (flip, sliding keyboard, adjustable cameras, etc), we basically only have one model of smart phone (excluding folding phones).
Less competition would mean higher prices.
Models, not factories. I don't care what factory would produce them. Plus the concept of "competition and price" is an abstract thing from economics textbooks. You know, like "communism" or those kids buying a crazy numbers of watermelons. In the real world "competitors" would form cartel and regulate prices as they wish. And please, don't counterargument with a reference to something that happened in '53. That is no more relevant than late Roman economics from II century CE :)
The less competition there is in a market, the less incentive companies have to reduce their profit margins to gain market share. Antitrust legislation is typically used to ban cartels, but with so few market participants, the need to collaborate in fixing prices is lessened.
Even 5 models per company would be bad for the survival of that company.
That's five. No corporate friendly model, no alternative form factors for people that want to burn money (the most profitable phone), no mid range. Just extremes. Now if a competitor comes out with a new idea you have nothing to retain customers. Now you're right for a hostile takeover over.
Do you realize not all companies have to provide each of those.
Any company that doesn't goes out of business.
Please elaborate, unless your argument is something like "line must go up"
If the line stays flat they become vulnerable to a takeover. It's not how I want things to be but it is the way it is.
Unification and standardization. 5 models. Intricate tuning is done by customer PC style.
Forget it, you people are so accustomed to being corpo-slaves that you don't deserve a dictator like me :)
You people?
I'm not even talking about the user side. I'm focusing on the business reality side. Any manufacturer that only puts out five models is going to be out of business. It's not the way I want it but it is the business reality.
I worked in the cell phone industry. Every manufacturer that only carried five models is out of business. Even Apple had to expand its offerings because they were losing market share and putting themselves at risk.
Five models creates more monopoly power, not less. Things would get so much worse than they are now. We would need to change the entire market place demand structure in order to make 5 models a workable option.
And you don't want people tuning cell phones. That's a recipe for brand damage and goes against the idea that their devices are ready to use for an easy and seamless experience. The customers would revolt.
Again, not my preference, business reality.