this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
34 points (94.7% liked)

Selfhosted

63012 readers
1691 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
34
I’m looking for the best remote access solution that works for me (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 days ago by SanPe_@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello,

I stopped using TeamViewer a very long time ago. Since then, I’ve been using DWService and I’m quite happy with it. I like the fact that I can access to the terminal without launching any graphical component on the machine (which is handy for my headless servers, and allows me not to open SSH port). I also like the fact that it works even if my VPN server is down, as I can access remote servers that aren’t accessible via the web when they’re no longer reachable through my VPN.

However, there are a few issues that are bothering me more and more. I’ve switched my mum’s computer to Fedora and, whilst it worked perfectly under Windows, remote control is very buggy under fedora because the connection isn’t great. Furthermore, it’s impossible to access the screen if the computer isn’t unlocked.

So, I’d really like to find a solution that meets my criteria:

  • Accessible via a web browser
  • Ideally open-source
  • Free
  • Ideally self-hostable, but I’m worried that if, for example, my reverse proxy or VPN crashes, I won’t be able to access my machines to debug them?
  • Allows access to servers without a monitor
  • Allows access to computers running Fedora without the need for prior unlocking

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

root is a user account that has all privileges and is what bots are programmed to probe, so exposing it introduces unnecessary risk. IMO there's no reason to permit root login via ssh in any circumstance, ever, in all cases, absolutely.

For all the people thinking, "well the world doesn't work in absolutes, there's always a special case!" There isn't.

If a user needs to use elevated permissions, there are many ways to do that without exposing root. sudo(8) is one way to do that.

[–] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the great explanation! Seems like because logging in as root is never necessary and indeed never done; people confuse sudoer for root login.

[–] 7EP6vuI@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

do you use sudo with a password? this and the unknown username is what get as additional security then?