politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
They aren't serfs, they were free to leave. The land however is owned but the people of Ukraine, not just those people who arguably decided to leave Ukraine.
The video that the icc has in multiple genius. They're mostly public at this point.
Neat, there's no evidence of that and it doesn't change the fact that land is not theirs to cede.
And the mondochians think you're twat. Good, were even huh?
Azov didn't find them, civilians did.
You're aware the official position of Russia at the moment is it never happened all those people were alive and were actors, correct? Why are you taking positions even Russia thinks are batshit crazy.
Could the invader not simply leave and end the conflict?
Lie. Azov Brigade "cleared" Bucha. They called them safaris because anyone not UAF was shot.
So again, what video? Everything is based on what the Banderites claimed, and nothing else.
You're being willfully dense.
That doesn't change the fact the first reports were from civilians outside of the intercepted messages from Russians about the massacre.
Literally bucha video, you're on the fucking internet use it. You won't answer a simple yes or no question but you're crying because I won't baby bird information to you? Logical.
Uh huh. So again could the invaders not simply leave and end the conflict?
Uh huh so again irrelevant.
Uh huh, I don't watch sports but sure try the ad hominem shit, you clearly can't win an actual argument, maybe you'll be a better bully but evidence seems to point otherwise now doesn't it?
Again. Couldn't the invader simply leave and end the conflict? I'll keep asking it and you still can't answer it and keep your job. Prove me wrong boo boo
This is the first video taken in space.
https://youtu.be/7xXY_5NLCNY
Checkmate.
Russia admits it invaded, why the fuck are you taking up crazier positions than Russia itself? Who else would be an invader dipshit, fuckin Santa Claus? The tooth fairy, there's a line between fucking moron and paid shill and I believe you just crossed it.
Could Germany have left Poland and ended the conflict? Also there's the whole soviets wiring with the Nazis before the Nazis betrayed them.
You're being an idiot and when ever has the invader been the good guy comrade, draw the line where imperialist land grabbing stops being bad and starts being good.
I'll wait.