this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2026
213 points (93.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

33786 readers
2496 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
anzo@programming.dev
Feyter@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
213
Anon died on the "clang format bad" hill (programming.dev)
submitted 16 hours ago by danhab99@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
269 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Mine is that the useState hook is an actual plague on the entire React ecosystem. Regardless of your opinions of React, if you wanna use something then use it right.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I agree that everyone needs to think for themselves, absolutely.

However, I struggle with this and it's kind of what I'm getting at:

his opinions on AI are pure trash and bootlickery

Firstly, you'll be hard pressed to find someone who hate's AI more than me. It literally keeps me awake at night. I hate the environmental impact. I hate the people it's enriching. I hate the work it's stealing. I don't often use the word "hate" but it really does apply here.

That said, I always try to defer to the opinions of people with more experience than me, and as regards kernel maintenance and Linus, that's certainly true.

You've probably heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect. I know a bit about code, a bit about FOSS, a bit about linux, AI, and communities. So it's easy to underestimate the yawning chasm of experience and knowledge between myself and Linus.

That doesn't mean we have to blindly accept the opinions of others (I honestly haven't accepted Linus' opinion myself), but I'm aware of the profound discrepancy between my opinion and his and it concerns me.

All that aside, is it possible to acknowledge that something is the correct course of action even if it's not the ideal? I haven't been following the Linus / AI thing, but as I understand it a project like that kinda has to allow AI bug reports because threat actors will certainly be using AI to find exploitable bugs.

[–] ducktumn@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 1 points 5 hours ago

With the greatest respect, responding to this comment would be to engage in a discussion of whether Linus is right in this particular instance. I'm not willing to do that because I'm sure that's a conversation that's been had a billion times.

I was / am happy to talk about how we injest the opinions of experts in a more general way.