this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2026
414 points (94.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

33997 readers
1085 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
414
sigh... (misskey-taube.s3.eu-central-1.wasabisys.com)
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bignose@programming.dev 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Working professionals are, if at all competent to be committing code to a professional code base, entirely capable of writing their own commit messages.

If they can't write the commit message, they can't sufficiently explain in writing the commit they just made to anyone. So, they should not be working professionally on a code base.

If they are capable of writing the commit message with their own understanding in their own words, but they choose not to communicate their understanding in the commit message? Also disqualifying, they should not be working professionally on a code base. Human communication is essential to this work.

That this is a controversial position, is a clear sign of the Slopocalypse.

[–] xmo748@programming.dev -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Now I definitely know you haven't seen a real professional codebase. Professional git repos are full of one sentence commit messages with little to no explanation of what's in the change set.

Humans suck at communication, especially when there's pressure to get product features out the door. AI driven repos are full of beautifully summarized commits with clear explanations of architectural choices, change motivation, etc.

[–] bignose@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Now I definitely know you haven’t seen a real professional codebase.

Extremely wrong. So much for your assumptions.

Professional git repos are full of one sentence commit messages with little to no explanation of what’s in the change set.

Yes, humans can communicate poorly, of course. But people letting the LLMs do it do not understand what is in the change, and the LLM certainly doesn't. There's no one at all to ask because no one understands what was changed or why.

I'll take “sometimes lazy but they wrote it and their understanding of it can be interrogated”, all week.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

I used to put messages into my commits “if anyone reads this and messages me, I will give you $5”

Only one has ever been noticed by a coworker and that was like 5+ years after I made the commit