this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2026
572 points (98.1% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

7214 readers
421 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So, he wants to hire a person who is valued at 135k for 90-110k.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he wants to hire that 135k person at 75k.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago

No, it's even worse, what he wants that 135k person to go through the application process.

The guy seems to be from a placement agency so he doesn't actually care that the 135k applicant is going to tell the hiring manager to fuck of at the end of the application process when they get a 110k offer and thus not get hired, what he cares about is being seen sending tons of applicants.

He literally has different motivations than those doing the hiring.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

Once hired, he becomes a 100k guy and they suddenly want to pay them 70.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I interpret this as the company willing to pay more if there's an exceptional match, but posting ranges practically filters these profiles out.

But yeah, I'd be happier to actually see these ranges, way less room for companies to lowball you.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not posting salaries shows an utter lack of respect for my time.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember when I was working as a contractor that I would simply not deal with certain placement agencies after they sent me towards positions which were way below my rate and wasted my time on it.

In fact it's generally a pretty good red flag on an agency or potential contract that they're not willing to tell you early in the process what's the range of rates for the job.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah when I was working with recruiters the first question out of my mouth was "what's it pay?" Eventually got down to primarily going through one agency where the guy knew not to fuck me around but I made up for any annoyance that may have caused by being reliable. That was the only recruiter I ever dealt with who gave me multiple postings at a time to choose from.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Oh it absolutely does, but sadly enough they have plenty other ways to waste your time.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

At this point I'll be happy if they can tell salaries during the first interview, rather than having 3 rounds to then offer half of what I told them I earn on my first call

[–] SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Then post a second listing and pay range for a senior role. If someone applies for senior, treat them based on the upper requirements for the upper pay range.

[–] voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Then they are bad at posting ranges and should post better ones. The upper band of the range should be for exceptional matches.