this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
190 points (95.7% liked)

Canada

12611 readers
669 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/74351191

A proposed data center in northwestern Alberta could generate dozens of atomic bombs worth of heat every day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

a daily thermal load of between 16 and 18 gigawatts

Yes, there is a range in standard units. Please read the article more carefully.

[–] threeonefour@piefed.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's the common journalist error of mixing up power and energy. 1 Watt is 1 joule per second, and is a rate of power. Saying a datacentre will have a daily thermal load of 16 and 18 gigawatts is like saying your car has a daily thermal load of 14 litres of gas per kilometre.

Heat exchange can be given in watts, but again that's heat exchanged per second. If a room has a heat loss of 500w you can maintain temperature by using a 500w space heater on max or a 1000w space heater at 50% power. Saying the room requires 500w of heat daily doesn't make sense.

It's most likely the data centre has a maximum power draw of 18 gigawatts if everything was running at max all at once, which isn't a realistic average use, and also doesn't give an indication of how much heat is being produced.

It seems they got the 23 nuclear bombs by taking the amount of energy the Hiroshima nuclear bomb was estimated to have released (about 63 terajoule) and comparing it to the amount of energy consumed in 24 hours at a rate of 18 gigawatts (18 gigajoule/s × 86,400 s/day is about equal to 63 terajoule × 23).

[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This makes no sense tho. One sentence earlier, they say: "In all, the data center project will use about nine gigawatts of power using on-site natural gas generators per day, instead of drawing power from an energy grid"

You can't just use 9GW of energy and produce 16 GW of waste heat. That would be a very severe violation of every law of physics I know.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 6 points 1 day ago

You can't just use 9GW of energy and produce 16 GW of waste heat.

I suspect that's 9GW of usuable elctrical power.

Physics tells us no process is 100% efficient. If their gas powered generator is particularily innefficient, they might be burning 16 GW worth of gas to produce 9 GW of electricity, the 7 GW difference being mostly heat coming out of gas generators. The 9 GW of electricity would eventually turn into heat as well, which would come out of the processors and cooling systems