this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2026
125 points (98.4% liked)

Funny

16685 readers
754 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't he supposedly a trillionaire these days? $80B is a good start, but it's not nearly enough

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social -1 points 15 minutes ago

Isn’t he supposedly a trillionaire these days?

Only briefly, he went back down under $1T only a week or two after reaching it.

[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 28 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah the fact that this 80 billion dollar loss, which is larger than the GDP of a lot of countries, has zero effect on his quality of life is a pretty good indicator that the existence of billionaires is a danger to our economy and society.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 3 points 37 minutes ago

Also proof they shouldn't exist in the first place. Money in certain denominations is simply too much to merely fund any personal expenses. You can buy a fancy house with millions. You create/upgrade city and state infrastructure with billions. The difference between a million and a billion is staggering. I'm not sure where the cap should exist, but i simply don't think any individual should have even 1 billion dollars.