this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2026
145 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

42764 readers
5220 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a joke about face sitting.

Season 7 episode 21, Assie Come Home

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 29 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Not from the UK, what's this about. Can't sit on faces no more?

[–] remon@ani.social 52 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (4 children)

A new law that bans several kinks in porn is taking effect today.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 55 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Governmental kink shaming? Yikes.

[–] cruseo@piefed.world 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I sometimes feel like the British authorities would ban sex altogether if they could find people some other way that would be willing to eat kidney pie.

[–] cruseo@piefed.world 16 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

When it comes to British culture, the thing I’m most hung up on is their definition of “pudding“. As an American, this is what “pudding“ means to me:

But when the British use the word “pudding“ I have absolutely no goddamn idea what they mean. I have been trying to figure it out for decades, immersing myself in British culture, and I am no closer to figuring it out than I was when I started.

Is it a car? A breed of cow? A 15th century poet? A sweet sausage meat pie made with a crispy crust? A Welsh slur for immigrants? A sex act that was popular during the Victorian era? I have no fucking idea…

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 4 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

I can't guarantee it isn't any or all of those.

[–] cruseo@piefed.world 4 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago) (1 children)

THAT’S WHAT’S SO FUCKING FRUSTRATING!

I’M PRETTY SURE IT’S ALL OF THESE! AND ALSO MORE THINGS!

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 25 minutes ago (1 children)

They must have run out of words and got tired of borrowing them from other languages. Those who were still willing were all shipped to Australia? Sounds like a criminal act as far as the British are concerned.

[–] cruseo@piefed.world 1 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

I think this was during one of their cultural takeover luls, before they discovered a bunch of new foods and bugs. Maybe before Australia, but maybe before the Americas. Who the fuck knows.

Definitely during a period of a lot of disease and cousin-fucking, so 1000-1500AD. You know, when religion was very popular and science was not

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

The only one I know is the Christmas cake they agreed was so terrible they simply set it on fire.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Well, it's their business to know what you like doing in the privacy of a bedroom. Knowing is nothing at all like not knowing. The impacts on society are totally different.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 15 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

The way I read it is that possession of the material is illegal, not sharing or recording. Possession. In Denmark possession of CSAM was made illegal and it lead to police being forced to prosecute people who accidentally uncovered CSAM and wanted to report it. I haven't heard of specific cases, but if you want to report existence of CSAM on a CD that is in your hands which you found in the attic of a home you just moved into the police will tell you to destroy it immediately and forget about it because the law can't distinguish between the owner of the CSAM and the current temporary person that possesses it and reports it. The UK law sounds like it will create the same issue (not that I am arguing that consensual BDSM = CSAM. Far from it. I just fear the consequences could be transferrable to this law and outlawing possession of bits and bytes is always a problem).

I btw couldn't find face sitting on the list of outlawed kinks, so those who are into that are safe for now.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Do you have any documentation for these claims about Danish law? They don't match e.g. the rulings in the big Umbrella case from some years ago.

[–] imadethis@fedinsfw.app 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

In Denmark possession of CSAM was made illegal and it lead to police being forced to prosecute people who accidentally uncovered CSAM and wanted to report it. I haven’t heard of specific cases, but if you want to report existence of CSAM on a CD that is in your hands which you found in the attic of a home you just moved into the police will tell you to destroy it immediately and forget about it because the law can’t distinguish between the owner of the CSAM and the current temporary person that possesses it and reports it.

The fuuuuuck? Even in america, the stars would have to align for that to happen. The cop would have to dislike you, the prosecutor would have to dislike you (or be gunning for a higher political position and you're an easy mark for being tough on child criminals), the jury would have to hate you (or be really dumb and not believe you took the material to the cops in the first place), AND you would have to be dumb enough to not realize how hated you are in your local area and still give them the rope to hang you with.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It's nonsense.

See for example the Danish "Operation Umbrella" where more than 1000 cases of possession of CSAM were prosecuted because a video of two fifteen year olds had been shared around on FB messenger.

Those who had received and opened it did not get punished. Those who had passed it on or requested it did.

Perfectly sensible.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

there's websites that are deleting face sitting as it's unclear if it can be legally viewed as suffocation, so it's a classic morality law that uses vague language to get broad self censorship happening.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 1 points 2 hours ago

The vagueness is absolutely a problem and in morality laws might even be an intended side effect.

This source though interprets it differently saying that having a hand at the throat without actual choking isn't covered but do note the keyword seems to be is splattered all over the page. (PS. The page is SFW but I don't know about the rest of the site).

No matter what this is an inch away from being a straight up though police law.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 19 points 2 hours ago

Because historically that always goes well.

/S

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The govt really shouldn't open up that can of worms.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

Because who can resist an open can of worms 🤤😏