Greentext

7009 readers

641 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

447

Anon is a gamer (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 15 hours ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MHLoppy@fedia.io 22 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm definitely glad that FSR isn't bound to a brand or model, but DLSS just does so much better.

Not sure if you haven't kept up with the current-gen AMD cards, but FSR 4 released with the current RX 9000 series and is roughly halfway between DLSS 3 and DLSS 4 in overall image quality (i.e., it's good, but has some specific strengths and weaknesses compared to DLSS) and doesn't run on older-gen GPUs. With FSR 4, AMD gave up on the hardware-agnostic upscaling approach -- I guess because the quality just isn't there -- and worked with Sony on this new approach that uses their own hardware "AI cores" the same way Nvidia uses the equivalent cores for DLSS.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 6 points 11 hours ago

Doesn't run on older hardware? It seems more and more like DLSS. Well done on catching up AMD. /s