this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
126 points (89.4% liked)

Technology

74296 readers
4374 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oh_@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

What about transit? Why do Americans always have to drive. We need real alternatives to cars.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The suburban sprawl makes building transit a lot harder but to fix that we need to increase density but then it’s hard to increase density when you need space for cars because you have no usable transit

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Most suburbs have plenty of density to support transit as proved in other countries that provide good transit to their areas of similar density. However most suburbs have such bad transit you can't use it for anything and to people start believing the idea that it is impossible to get them good transit and so they won't agree to get it.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The American style suburbs where you have just single family homes and the closest stores are 5 miles away?

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 1 hour ago

Most suburbs a store is not that far. you will often drive more than that for a store you like but something is closer.

american suburb covers a lot of variation. If you have a horse as some of the least dense support that is different from ones where you get a postage stamp lot. Streetcar suburbs designed before cars are ess dense than the new developments they are putting is around me today.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Chicken and egg situation, Americans drive because that’s how their cities and suburbs are laid out (excluding NYC, for the most part).

They don’t rely on alternatives because they are slow, inconvenient or non-existent; alternatives can’t be built up as the costs can’t be justified based on existing patronage levels.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Plenty of US cities are built like NY, on grids, as circles, etc. The problem is that everything is far away.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

It’s not so much about being built on a grid, but rather being built with a particularly high population density in mind - and further supported by a robust public transit network.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago

No, the problem is the network matters. When you can't get anywhere on transit you don't use it and in turn won't help improve it. I've many times looked at the transit options available to me and found I was unable to get my errand done on transit so I was forced to drive. One place I lived I checked and transit could do the job so I sold my car (but my wife still had hers because there were still many things we couldn't do on transit)

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 3 points 9 hours ago

transit

"We mean electric cars, you commie! The next time you talk about that thing, you are going out that window."

\s