this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
35 points (97.3% liked)

Canada

11769 readers
687 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

To be clear, Carney isn't advocating for doing away with the Notwithstanding Clause. He is advocating for having the Supreme Court rule whether the law is infringing on the rights of Canadians whether they invoke the clause or not. He feels that we should know that our elected officials agrees infringing in our rights when we go to the ballot box. I agree.