this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
4087 readers
297 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No pics of text
Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
Post news related to the United States.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I do appreciate that they're trying to do something, but my fear is that they're going to make An App™ which has the exact same problems as ICEBlock: a) easily censored, b) violates user privacy (inadvertently or otherwise). I'd rather that they work with and offer protection to existing operators that have been successful, rather than spend money on expensive tech consultants just to reinvent ICEBlock.
Besides, even apps are tied to domain hosts and registrars. You can't run anything on the public internet without them. A bog standard website bypasses the App Store middleman, and your browser is able to better protect against data collection than a native app may be (depending on how the app is programmed and distributed).
They are trying to resolve a) by having it be an official legislative function rather than an easily dismissable vigilante effort, and maybe b), but there aren't enough details yet for me to say one way or the other.
Congresspeople can't use their power effectively to coerce one private entity to do something to cover for another, that's why attorneys general, governors and congresspeople are all taking this into their own hands to help make robust cases against this administration.