this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
-14 points (20.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3525 readers
176 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The parent comment is all ad hominem & genetic fallacy lacking substance or criticism of the article. Clearly it disapproves of the writer & publication, and it derides irrelevant contingencies about ancestry, provenance, wealth. As for anything of substance about the article itself: nothing.

See how that works? This comment evaluated the substance of the parent comment. I challenge lemmy to do better & try that with the article.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When I see a crazy person throwing poop at everyone, I don't talk about how much fiber he's been eating or how good his pitching arm is...

I cross to the other side of the road and, if anything, say to someone next to me:

That mothefucker is crazy

And expect no more than a head nod in response.

If somebody asked why we didn't try being covered in the crazy man's poop...

In person I'd have probably already left, because that person let the crazy guy pelt him with shit for 15 minutes just to see what it was like. So now they smell like shit, and are advocating the validity of throwing shit as a means of communication.

See how that works?

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When I see a crazy person

That mothefucker is crazy

Ad hominem again: the parent commenter only seems to argue in logical fallacies.