496
'Next Step Is Primaries': Calls for Schumer Ouster After Leading Shutdown Surrender
(www.commondreams.org)
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
496 points (99.6% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3520 readers
438 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes/pics of text
Post news related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I genuinely don't know how that makes any sense in response to what I just said.
I'm over here fucking despairing about being betrayed AGAIN by the group that's supposed to be NOT Nazis, having my life fucked in another new and novel way, and I'm licking boots? Whose fucking boots am I licking?
Make that bullshit accusation make sense.
You might be talking to a bot or a moron.
Between that and their apparent desire to try to kick obviously hurting people when they are down, maybe they ought run for office themselves. Would fit right in.
Yeah I'm real sure you keep posting like that telling people to just give up and not fight back cause you are sad. Sure buddy. Your post history makes it real clear who you are advocating for.
Again, justify that accusation. You don’t know a thing about me. I’ll give you some information you don’t deserve, and the only thing I want to see in response is either an apology or a real argument explaining what your problem actually is.
I am married to someone who has an autoimmune issue. Health insurance for my family is mandatory. I get that insurance for her through a job I hate so much I fantasize about getting into a wreck on the way into work because then I wouldn't have to go. Together we developed a plan that would allow me to do a career change that would allow me to switch careers into something that DOESN'T make me dread damn near every waking moment. A plan that relied on the ACA as an insurance stopgap. That just got taken away. Stolen away. Given to Nazis in exchange for NOTHING.
What about that sounds like “bootlicking” to you? What makes it so unbelievable that I might be upset? Explain yourself, apologize, or just have the decency to stop responding altogether.
Edit: Initial draft was uncivil. Cleaned the language up some, not entirely, while maintaining the substance of the initial response.
What's there to get? You are telling people to lay down. Give up. Not fight back. Abandon all hope. It's a very apparent patern in your comments. Don't bother documenting fascist crimes it won't do anyything. Don't bother organizing. Don't bother resisting. Lay down and roll over. Thats the tone. Excuse me if that sounds 100% like exactly what the fascists are hoping people think. Relying on us to behave. Can't imagine a better way to lick that boot.
Stop doing their work for them, assuming that isn't your goal. Or at the very least have the courage to keep your defeatism to yourself instead of trying to demoralize the rest of us.
You’re lecturing me for “defeatism” while you’ve said yourself:
Yeah the thousands of people who are going to die, be bankrupted, and or go homeless in the meantime probably don’t give a fuck about how it might change the elections in a year.
There was never a time in American history where checks and balances actually protected the rights of anyone. Nothing we are seeing today is new. This is how the system has always worked. Also hierarchical authority is incapable of fighting corruption.
So when you say it, it’s righteous outrage. When I say it, it’s “bootlicking”? That’s not conviction, that’s ego.
You’re not defending hope. You’re defending the sound of your own voice. If you can’t tell the difference between grief and complicity, that’s your literacy problem, not mine.
And coming from someone who lectures strangers about “polite forms of communication” while doing nothing but sneer and posture, you might want to sit this one out.
Yeah. I can look at post histories too. The difference is, I’ve offered concrete examples, a thing you are oddly reluctant to do, because any of my comments would fall directly under the explanation I already provided, one you’ve agreed with in your own words. One wonders what might motivate your dodging a challenge issued multiple times.
How delusional do you have to be to think that electing more spineless Democrats has anything to do with fighting back?