this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
1324 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

10412 readers
812 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. See stickied post https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

This is me once again seeing the LGBTQ+ initialism and asking people to switch to the more respectable and scientific term "Sexual and Gender Minorities" or SGM for short.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago

Or queer. Or the archaic gender neutral 'gay'¹

¹but not the modern more masculine gendered 'gay'

[–] spinne@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Fair request, duly noted. Thank you for the info

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's a reasonable request. In all honesty I will probably stick with the notation i've already been using the last several decades. Same Sex Attraction/-ed/&c. is also theoretically a respectable and scientific term, but i've been around too many people who use it as a slur so i'm not sold on adopting scientific nomenclature for colloquial use.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone -4 points 10 months ago

Wouldn't gender minorities include men? Women is the majority gender. I think you need a term that excludes cis men and women.