‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘
Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01
But did he consider some may just be Lemmy users?
underrated comment.
Is it? It wasn't even 15 minutes old when you commented.
It's still underrated. Should be top.
It wasn't a top level comment. Either way you may like to take a look at the behind the scenes of Lemmy's various sorting options.
It's a novelty in a world of opaque blackbox algorithms.