‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘
Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01
If I'm being generous, usually the second chance comes in primary education. The AI stuff is new enough maybe they could get one shot at reformation. Though they should plainly see it's cheating, so I'm not sure I'm really convinced by my own argument, but I'll at least try to put forth the devil's advocate argument...
Yes, I suppose I would give them one chance to do it again properly and if it’s still ai that second time and they seem more just annoyed that they were caught, then buhbye!