Technology

42518 readers

97 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

remington@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

We put the new pocket-size vinyl format to the test—with mixed results (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 months ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We recently looked at Tiny vinyl, a new miniature vinyl single format developed through a collaboration between a toy industry veteran and the world’s largest vinyl record manufacturer. The 4-inch singles are pressed in a process nearly identical to standard 12-inch LPs or 7-inch singles, except everything is smaller. They have a standard-size spindle hole and play at 33⅓ RPM, and they hold up to four minutes of music per side.

Several smaller bands, like The Band Loula and Rainbow Kitten Surprise, and some industry veterans like Blake Shelton and Melissa Etheridge, have already experimented with the format. But Tiny Vinyl partnered with US retail giant Target for its big coming-out party this fall, with 44 exclusive titles launching throughout the end of this year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] snowsuit2654@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kinda strange. Why not just use 45s? I guess perhaps cheap modern turntables can't play 45 rpm. But I feel like those turntables often have automatic arms and might not be able to play this either.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago

Smaller = cheaper to make, less space needed for storage, etc. They also look thicker, so might be more robust. I'd be surprised if any record player couldn't play 45 rpm, the reason for 33⅓ will be because they are smaller they need to be slower to increase the playing time.